Semantičko objavljivanje te usporedba entiteta prve skupine između SPAR ontologija FaBiO-a i FRBR DL-a te bibliografskih ontologija FaBiO i BIBFRAME
Main Article Content
Sažetak
Cilj. Semantičko objavljivanje koristi koncepte i alate semantičkog weba i nastalo je njegovim razvojem. Budući da se klasičan način publiciranja znanstvenih radova suočio s njihovim brzim porastom, bilo je potrebno osigurati metode njihove automatske organizacije. Cilj ovoga rada jest definirati značenje semantičkog objavljivanja znanstvenih radova te usporediti FaBiO i FRBR DL te FaBiO i BIBFRAME.
Metodologija. Metodološki je pristup u ovom radu komparativno-analitički. Analizirana je bibliografska ontologija FaBiO metodom komparacije s FRBR DL-om te BIBFRAME-om.
Rezultati. Korištenje tehnologija semantičkog weba omogućuje poboljšanje značenja objavljenog članka u časopisu, olakšavanje njegovog automatskog otkrivanja, povezivanje sa semantički povezanim člancima te pristupanje podacima unutar članka. Semantičke web tehnologije, kao npr. RDF, RDFS, OWL i SPARQL formalni su alati koji to omogućuju. FaBiO se temelji na FRBR entitetima. U radu je prikazano kako se može pojednostaviti FRBR prikaz uz pomoć bibliografske ontologije FaBiO. Prikazana je i usporedba FaBi-a te BIBFRAME-a.
Vrijednost. Članci i znanstveni podaci trebaju biti strojno čitljivi te jednostavni za pronalaženje i pregledavanje. Rezultati pretraživanja bitni su za znanstvena istraživanja radi postavljanja hipoteze te interpretacije. Semantičko objavljivanje pospješuje veći broj prijava radova, veći broj čitatelja i veće čimbenike utjecaja. Mogućnost pronalaženja članaka srodne tematike te otkrivanja nepoznatih veza između radova koji nisu eksplicitno povezani citatima doprinosi boljim čimbenicima utjecaja.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a KreativniCommons Attribution-NonCommercial Međunarodne licence.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava za članke objavljene u časopisu, no svojim pristankom na objavljivanje daju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja u tiskanom te elektroničkom formatu. Čitatelji mogu radove čitati, preuzeti, raspačavati, umnožavati i koristiti u prezentacijama u nekomercijalne svrhe.
Ovo djelo je dano na korištenje pod licencom Creative Commons Imenovanje-Nekomercijalno 4.0 međunarodna.
Reference
Almeida, M.; R. Souza; F. Fonseca (2011). Semantics in the Semantic Web: A Critical Evaluation. Knowledge Organization 38,3 : 187-203.
Arcus, D.; B. Giasson. Bibliographic Ontology Specification. Dostupno na: http://bibliontology.com.
Baker, T.; K. Coyle; S. Petiya (2014). Multi-entity models of resource description in the Semantic Web A comparison of FRBR, RDA and BIBFRAME. LHT 32, 4: 562-582.
Barbarić, A. (2009). Entitet izraz konceptualnog modela FRBR od teorijskog značaja do praktične primjene. In: 12. seminar Arhivi, knjižnice, muzeji. Mogućnosti suradnje u okruženju globalne informacijske infrastrukture (Pp 142-166). Zagreb: Hrvatsko knjižničarsko društvo.
Berners Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny f the World Wide Web by its Inventor. New York: Harper Collins.
Berners Lee, T.; J. Hendler; O. Lasilla (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284: 35-43.
Biagetti, M.T. (2018). A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Bibliographic Ontologies. Challenges and Opportunities for Knowledge Organization in the Digital Age. In: F. Ribeiro and M. F. Cerveira (eds). Proceedings of the fifteenth International ISKO conference (Pp501-505). Baden-Baden: Ergon.
Biageti, M. T. (2020). Ontologies as knowledge organization systems. Research gate, 2-39.
Bianchini, C.; M. Guerrini (2009). From bibliographic models to cataloging rules: remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD and RDA and the relationships between them. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 47, 2 : 105-124.
Bibframe 2.0. Dostupno na https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/.
Bibframe 2.0 Model. Dostupno na https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html.
Bibframe 2.0 Vocabulary. Dostupno na http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe-category.html.
Carlyle, A. (2006). Understanding FRBR as a Conceptual Model: FRBR and the Bibliographic Universe. Library Resources and Technical Services 50, 4: 264–73.
Christman, D.; E. King (2020). Bibframe Basics: A Crash Course. The Serials Librarian 78, 1-4: 17-21.
Coyle, K. (2022). Works, Expressions, Manifestations, Items: An ontology. Code4lib Journal 53.
Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR before and after: a look at out Bibliographic Models. Chicago: Ala editions.
Coyle, K. (2014). FRBR.Twenty Years On. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 1-22.
Denton, W. (2007). FRBR and the history of cataloging. In: Arlene G. Taylor (eds). Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval (Pp35-57). Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.
Dumontier, M. (2017). Genuine Semantic Publishing. Data Science 1. 139-154.
FaBiO: The FRBR-aligned Bibliographic Ontology, http://purl.org/spar/fabio.
Evans, J.(2008). Electronic publishing and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science, 321: 395–9.
Gerstein, M.; M. Seringhaus; S. Fields (2007). Structured digital abstract makes text mining easy. Nature, 447- 142.
Hickey, T., E. T. O’Neill; J. T. Toves (2002). Experiments with the IFLA functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR). D-Lib magazine, 8, 9: 1–13.
Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report: as amended and corrected through February (2009). Dostupno na: URL http://www. ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf.
Jett, J.; T. Nurmikko-Fuller; W. T. Cole; R. K. Page; J. S. Downie (2016). Enhancing Scholarly Use of Digital Libraries: A Comparative Survey and Review of Bibliographic Metadata Ontologies. JCDL, 35-44.
Knut, H., Murtomaa E. (2003). Data mining marc to find: Frbr?International Cataloging and Bibliographic Control 32, 3: 52-55.
Kroeger, A. (2013). The road to BIBFRAME: The evolution of the idea of bibliographic transition into a post-MARC future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 51: 873-890.
Marcoux, Y.; E. Rizkallah. Intertextual semantics: A semantics for information design. Dostupno na: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21134/full.
Madison, O.M.A. (2000). The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Library Resources & Technical Services 44, 3: 153–15.
Meehan, T. P. BIBFRAME. (2014). Catalogue and Indeks 174: 43-52.
Mitchell, Erik T. (2013). Three Case Studies in Linked Open Data. Library Technology Reports 49, 5: 26-43.
Mukhopadhyay , P. (2020). Bibliographic Relationships: From Principles to Practice. Indian Journal of Information, Library & Society 33, 3-4: 142-163.
Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model. Dostupno na: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html (pristupljeno 6.5.2023)
Park, J. R.; A. Brenza; L. Richards. (2020). BIBFRAME Linked Data: A Conceptual Study on the Prevailing Content Standards and Data Model. /Linked open data. Kingsley Okoje, 134.
Peroni, S.; D. Shotton. (2012). FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 17, 33-43.
Peroni, S.; Shotton, D. (2018). The SPAR Ontologies. International Semantic Web Conference ISWC, 119-136.
Peroni, S; D. Shotton. (2012). Mapping JATS to RDF using the SPAR (Semantic Publishing and Referencing ontologies). Research gate.
Peroni, S.; D. Shotton; F. Vitali. (2012). Scholarly publishing and linked data: describing Roles, Statuses, Temporal and Contextual Extents. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems. Graz
Riva, P.; P. Le Bœuf; Žumer, M. (2017). IFLA Library Reference Model A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. Den Haag: IFLA LRM.
Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies. [citirano: 2022-05-20]. Dostupno na: http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies.
Sally H. McCallum. (2018). BIBFRAME Development. JLIS.iT 8, 3:71-85.
Seringhaus, M.; M. Gerstein (2007). Publishing perishing? Towards tomorrow’s information architecture. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 17.
Seringhaus, M.; M. Gerstein. (2008). Manually structured digital abstracts: a scaffold for automatic text mining. FEBS Letters, 582: 1170.
Shadbolt, N., W. Hall, T. Berners-Lee. (2006). T. The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21: 96–101.
Shotton, D. Extending FRBR within FaBiO. [citirano: 2022-05-20]. Dostupno na: http//: https://opencitations.wordpress.com/2011/06/29/extending-frbr-within-fabio/amp/.
Shotton, D. (2009). Semantic publishing: the coming revolution in scientific journal publishing. Learned Publishing 22, 2: 85-94.
Shotton, D.; K. Portwin; G. Klyne; A. Miles. (2009). Adventures in Semantic Publishing: g: exemplar semantic enhancement of a research article. (Submitted for publication.) Preprint available at http:// purl.org/net/semanticpublication/Shotton_et_al_PLo S_enhancement_report.pdf
Taniguchi, S. (2017). Examining- BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema. Calaloging and Classification Quarterly 55, 6:387-412.
Taniguchi, S. (2018). Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources? Calaloging and Classification Quarterly 56, 1:40-61.
Tillet, B. What is FRBR? A conceptual model for bibbliographic universe. Dostupno na: http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF
Topić, N. (2011). Primjena modelaFRBR na opis i pronalaženje digitalnih dokumenata: funkcionalnost atributa entiteta pojavni oblik. Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 54, 4: 141-160.
W3C OWL Working Group. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview. W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web Consortium. Dostupno na http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ (pristupljeno 20.3.2023).
Žumer, M. (2007). FRBR: the end of the road or a new begining? // Bulletin of the American Society for INformation Science and Technology 6, 33: 27-29.