Publikacijske prakse autora iz društvenog i humanističkog područja u Republici Hrvatskoj
Main Article Content
Sažetak
Cilj. Cilj istraživanja bio je analizirati sličnosti i razlike u publikacijskim praksama autora iz društvenoga i humanističkoga područja u Republici Hrvatskoj s obzirom na područje znanosti u kojem djeluju i akademski status kojem pripadaju. Specifični ciljevi ovog rada bili su ispitati povezanost publikacijskih praksi i pritiska za objavljivanje te razlike među razlozima za objavljivanje radova kod autora iz društvenog i humanističkog područja te u odnosu na pripadnost različitom akademskom statusu.
Metodologija. Istraživanje je provedeno od srpnja do rujna 2021. godine. Anketnom upitniku pristupilo je 319 ispitanika iz društvenog i 292 ispitanika iz humanističkog područja znanosti u Republici Hrvatskoj u različitim akademskim zvanjima.
Rezultati. Rezultati analize publikacijskih praksi pokazuju da ispitanici iz humanističkog područja više objavljuju uredničke knjige te poglavlja u knjigama, dok ispitanici iz društvenog područja objavljuju više radova u časopisima i zbornicima skupova. Ispitanici u višem akademskom statusu objavljuju sve vrste publikacija više od ispitanika u nižem akademskom statusu. Razlike u razlozima za objavljivanje nisu velike, ali u prosjeku su malo više izraženi intrinzični razlozi za objavljivanje radova kod ispitanika u humanističkom području: rado prihvaćaju nove znanstvene izazove i uživaju u istraživanju i pisanju. Autorima u obama područjima podjednako je važna afirmacija kao samostalnog znanstvenika. Ispitanicima u višem akademskom statusu nešto su važniji ekstrinzični razlozi objavljivanja radova: suradnici su na projektu u sklopu kojega se očekuje objavljivanje rezultata istraživanja te zbog mogućnosti financiranja budućih projekata. Razlog objavljivanja zbog povećanja plaće nešto je viši kod ispitanika nižeg akademskog statusa. Ispitanici višeg akademskog statusa percipiraju manji pritisak nego mlađi kolege. Prosječni percipirani pritisak za objavljivanje podjednak je kod ispitanika iz društvenog i humanističkog područja.
Originalnost. Rad doprinosi razumijevanju publikacijskog ponašanja autora iz društvenog i humanističkog područja i u različitom akademskom statusu. Rezultati ovog istraživanja pridonose razumijevanju obrazaca i razloga za objavljivanje radova te uvidu u percipirani pritisak za objavljivanje radova zbog ispunjavanja uvjeta za napredovanje.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a KreativniCommons Attribution-NonCommercial Međunarodne licence.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava za članke objavljene u časopisu, no svojim pristankom na objavljivanje daju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja u tiskanom te elektroničkom formatu. Čitatelji mogu radove čitati, preuzeti, raspačavati, umnožavati i koristiti u prezentacijama u nekomercijalne svrhe.
Ovo djelo je dano na korištenje pod licencom Creative Commons Imenovanje-Nekomercijalno 4.0 međunarodna.
Reference
Agarwal, N. K. (2018). Exploring context in information behavior: Seeker, situation, surroundings, and shared identities. Springer Nature.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2: 179-211.3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Association of College and Research Libraries (2019). Open and Equitable Scholarly Communications: Creating a More Inclusive Future. Prepared by Nancy Maron and Rebecca Kennison with Paul Bracke, Nathan Hall, Isaac Gilman, Kara Malenfant, Charlotte Roh, and Yasmeen Shorish. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries. https:// doi.org/10.5860/acrl.1
Bates, M.J. (2017). Information Behavior. In: J.D. McDonald and M. Levine-Clark (eds.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. 4th ed. (Pp. 2074–2085). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EISA120053335
Blankstein, M. (2022). Ithaka S+ R US faculty survey 2021. [citirano: 2023–05–16]. Dostupno na:https://sr.ithaka.org/publications/ithaka-sr-us-faculty-survey-2021/
Blankstein, M.; Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2019). Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2018. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.311199
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford University Press.
Borgman, C.L.; Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. In B.Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36: 3-72. Medford, NJ: Information Today. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360102
Borgman, C. L. (2010). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7434.001.0001
Braxton, J. M. (2010). Norms and the work of colleges and universities: Introduction to the special issue—norms in academia. The Journal of Higher Education 81, 3: 243–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779052
Byström et al. (2016). Byström, K., Ruthven, I.; Heinström, J. (2016). Work and information: which workplace models still work in modern digital workplaces? Information Research 22, 1. [citirano: 2023–05–14]. Dostupno na: https://informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1651.html
Chang, Y. W.; Su, Y. C. (2022). Comparison of Trends in the Degree of Publication Diversity among Fields of Social Sciences and Humanities at National Taiwan University. Journal of Library and Information Studies 20, 2: 29-54. https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.202212_20(2).029
Choo, C.W. (2006). The knowing organization: how organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Crawford, S. (1978.). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 13: 61-81. Navedeno prema: Devadason, F. J., & Lingam, P. P. (1997). A methodology for the identification of information needs of users. IFLA Journal, 23, 1: 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/034003529702300109
De Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press
Dill, D.D. (2012). The Management of Academic Culture Revisited: Integrating Universities in an Entrepreneurial Age. In: Stensaker, B., Välimaa, J., Sarrico, C.S. (eds) Managing Reform in Universities. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284297_12
Fitzgerald, S. R. (2020). Toward a conceptual framework for scholarly information seeking. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 46, 6 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102259
Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned obsolescence: Publishing, technology, and the future of the academy. New York University Press.
Garfield, E. (1996). What is the primordial reference for the phrase ‘publish or perish’. The Scientist 10, 12: 11. [citirano: 2023–04–11]. Dostupno na:https://www.the-scientist.com/commentary/what-is-the-primordial-reference-for-the-phrase-publish-or-perish-57976
Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science: Facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students. Pergamon Press.
Garvey, W. D.; Griffith, B. C. (1971). Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist 26, 4: 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032059
Garvey, W. D.; Griffith, B. C. (1967). Scientific communication as a social system: The exchange of information on research evolves predictably and can be experimentally modified. Science 157, 3792: 1011–1016. 10.1126/science.157.3792.1011
Greifeneder, E.; Schlebbe, K. (2022). How things fit together: a general model of the information behaviour field. Information Research 27. Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2228
Haven et al. (2019). Haven, T. L., Bouter, L. M., Smulders, Y. M.; Tijdink, J. K. (2019). Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks. PloS One 14, 6, e0217931. 10.1371/journal.pone.0217931
Herman, E. A. (2005). The information needs of contemporary academic researchers. (Doctoral dissertation, City University London).
Hyland, K. (2015) Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jamali et al. (2014). Jamali, H. R.; D. Nicholas; A. Watkinson; E. Herman; C. Tenopir; K. Levine; S. Allard i suradnici (2014). How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences. Library & Information Science Research 36, 3-4: 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.002
Jamali, H. R. (2008). Information-seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers: an intradisciplinary study. PhD dissertation, University College London.
Johnson R. Watkinson A. Mabe M. & STEM International Association of Scientific Technical and Medical Publishers. (2018). The stm report an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing (5th ed.). STEM. International Association of Scientific Technical and Medical Publishers. [citirano: 2023–06–23]. Dostupno na: https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf
Kepalienė, F. (2021). Lithuanian scholars' open access publishing behaviour and its determinants (Doctoral dissertation, Vilniaus universitetas).
Kling, R.; McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 14: 1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1047>3.0.CO;2-T
Klobas, J. E.; Clyde, L. A. (2010). Beliefs, attitudes and perceptions about research and practice in a professional field. Library & Information Science Research 32, 4: 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.004
Lambovska, M.; Yordanov, K. (2020). Motivation of researchers to publish in high-quality journals: A theoretical framework. TEM Journal, 9,1: 188–197. DOI: 10.18421/TEM91-27
Late et al. (2019). Late, E., Tenopir, C., Talja, S.; Christian, L. (2019). Reading practices in scholarly work: from articles and books to blogs, Journal of Documentation 75, 3: 478–499. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2018-0178
Late, E. (2014). Cultural and contextual shaping of scholarly communication. Publishing and reading practices in Finnish state research institutes. Academic Dissertation. University of Tampere.
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E.; Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly 66, 2: 161–193.
Mabe, M. (2012). Does journal publishing have a future? In R. Campbell, E. Pentz, & I. Borthwick (Eds.), Academic and professional publishing. Oxford: Chandos. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-669-2.50017-2
Mabe, M.; Amin, M. (2002), "Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author‐reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing", Aslib Proceedings, 54, 3: 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530210441692
Macevičiūtė, E., & Kepalienė, F. (2022). Factors influencing Lithuanian researchers’ use of open access repositories as a publishing channel. Information Research, 27. Special Issue. [citirano: 2023–04–1]. Dostupno na: https://informationr.net/ir/27-SpIssue/isic22/isic2210.html
March, J. G.; Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John Wiley & sons.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster
Merton, R. K.; (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moosa, I. A. (2018). Publish or perish: Perceived benefits versus unintended consequences. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Moksness, L.; Olsen, S. O. (2017). Understanding researchers’ intention to publish in open access journals. Journal of Documentation 73, 6: 1149–1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2017-0019
Mrva-Montoya, A.; Luca, E. J. (2021). Book publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Australia, Part One: Understanding institutional pressures and the funding context. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 52, 2: 67–87. DOI: 10.3138/jsp.52.2.01
Mrva-Montoya, A., Luca, E. J., & Boateng, H. (2019). Understanding Australian Academic Authors in the Humanities and Social Sciences Their Publishing Experiences, Values, and Perspectives. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51, 1: 38–62. DOI: 10.3138/jsp.51.1.03
Mulligan, A., & Mabe, M. (2011). The effect of the internet on researcher motivations, behaviour and attitudes. Journal of Documentation, 67, 2: 290-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111109485
Nel, M. A., & Fourie, I. (2016). Information behavior and expectations of veterinary researchers and their requirements for academic library services. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 44–54.
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Abrizah, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Xu, J., ... & Świgon, M. (2020). Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study. Research evaluation, 29(3), 263–274.
Nicholas, D., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Watkinson, A., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Herman, E., Xu, J., ... & Świgoń, M. (2017). Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 205–217.
Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2010). Assessing information needs in the age of the digital consumer. Routledge.
Niewiadomska, E. M. (2021). Exploring the experiences of Australian science researchers; Library, Google and beyond. Doctoral disseration.
Niles, M. T., Schimanski, L. A., McKiernan, E. C., & Alperin, J. P. (2020). Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations. Plos one, 15(3), e0228914.
Paisley, W. J. (1968). Information needs and uses. Annual review of information science and technology 3, 1: 1–30.
Pravilnik o uvjetima za izbor u znanstvena zvanja (2017). Pravilnik o uvjetima za izbor u znanstvena zvanja. Narodne novine 28/2017, 652. Nacionalno vijeće za znanost, visoko obrazovanje i tehnološki razvoj. [citirano: 2023-04-24]. Dostupno na: https://narodnenovine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2017_03_28_652.html
Pravilnik o dodatnim uvjetima za izbor na znanstvena radna mjesta (2020). Pravilnik o dodatnim uvjetima za izbor na znanstvena radna mjesta. Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti 10-194/27-2020. [citirano: 2023–04–24]. Dostupno na: https://www.info.hazu.hr/upload/File/2020/ODLUKE-2020/PRAVILNIK-O-DODATNIM-UVJETIMA-ZA-ZNANSTVENA-RADNA-MJESTA-10-194-26-1-2020_02.pdf
Pravilnik o znanstvenim i umjetničkim područjima, poljima i granama (2019). Pravilnik o znanstvenim i umjetničkim područjima, poljima i granama. Narodne novine 118/2019, 2929. Nacionalno vijeće za znanost. [citirano: 2023–04–24]. Dostupno na: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2009_09_118_2929.html
Rowlands, J.; Wright, S. (2021). Hunting for points: the effects of research assessment on research practice. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 9): 1801–1815. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1706077
Saenen et al. (2019). Saenen, B., Morais, R., Gaillard, V., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2019). Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science: 2019 EUA Open Science and Access Survey Results. European University Association. [citirano: 2023–05–1]. Dostupno na: https://eua.eu/resources/publications/888:research-assessment-in-the-transition-to-open-science.html
Savolainen R. (2022). Everyday life as an evolving context of information behaviour. Aslib Journal of Information Management 20220906. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2022-0116
Savolainen, R. (2012). Conceptualizing information need in context. Information Research, 17, 4. http://InformationR.net/ir/17-4/paper534.html.
Savolainen, R. (2017). Information need as trigger and driver of information seeking: a conceptual analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management 69, 1: 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2016-0139
Savolainen, R. (2007). Information Behavior and Information Practice: Reviewing the “Umbrella Concepts” of Information‐Seeking Studies. The Library Quarterly 77, 2: 109-132. https://doi.org/4309863
Shehata, A. (2019). Exploring the scholarly communication styles of arab social science and humanities scholars. Learned Publishing 32, 4: 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1253
Shehata, A. M. K.; Elgllab, M. F. M. (2018). Where Arab Social Science and Humanities Scholars Choose To Publish: Falling In The Predatory Journals Trap. Learned Publishing 3, 31: 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1167
Shehata, A.; Edakar, M. (2018). Publishing research in the international context. the Electronic Library 36, 5: 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-01-2017-0005
Simon H. A. (2014). Administrative behavior : a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. 4th ed. The Free Press.
Talja, S., & Hansen, P. (2006). Information sharing. In: A. Spink and C.Cole (eds.). New directions in human information behavior (Pp. 113–134). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Tenopir C. (1995). Authors and readers: the keys to success or failure for electronic publishing. Library Trends 43, 4: 571–91.
Thompson John B. (2012) Merchants of culture: The publishing business in the twenty-first century. 2nd ed. Plume.
Van Dalen, H.; Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: a worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 7, 63: 1282-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636
Van Dalen, H. (2020). How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: The case of economists. Scientometrics 126, 2: 1675-1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03786-x
Vilar, P.; Juznić, P.; Bartol, T. (2015). Information behaviour of Slovenian researchers: investigation of activities, preferences and characteristics. Information Research 20, 2. [citirano: 2023–04-14]. Dostupno na: https://informationr.net/ir/20-2/paper670.html
Vilar, P. (2014). Information behaviour of scholars. Libellarium: časopis za istraživanja u području informacijskih i srodnih znanosti 7(1): 17–39. https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v7i1.194
Wilson, L. (1942). The academic man: A study in the sociology of a profession. Oxford University Press.
Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of documentation 37, 1: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026702
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of documentation 55, 3: 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing science, 3, 2: 49-56. https://doi.org/10.28945/576
Wilson, T. D. (2022.) Exploring information behaviour: an introduction. T.D. Wilson.